playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

FUT Esports

FUT · EMEA · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
7–4
Series
15–12
Maps
50%
Rounds · 580 rounds
51%
Attack · 278 attack rounds
49%
Defense · 302 defense rounds
FUT Esports scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None TL H2H · 5 maps VIT H2H · 3 maps KC H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.
Dimension FUT VIT Gap Reading Sample
Fewer wins by defuse 38% 52% -14 Different 101 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated 35% 30% +6 Not settled 19 maps
Top fragger takes more 23% 22% +1 Same 19 maps
Kills concentrated 20.1 20.1 +0.0 Same 19 maps
Higher headshot % 30% 26% +5 Different 19 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills 36.8 39.5 -2.6 Not settled 19 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against FUT 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves same 3 of 6 2 of 6 Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming different 3 of 6 1 of 6 Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
G2 Esports different 1 of 6 3 of 6 Kills concentrated
Global Esports same 4 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming same 6 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp different 3 of 6 1 of 6 Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
LOUD different 1 of 6 1 of 6 Opening kills concentrated
Nongshim RedForce same 2 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Kills concentrated
NRG different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex different 4 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
T1 same 3 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid same 5 of 6 0 of 6 More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Team Vitality same 2 of 6 2 of 6 Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
TYLOO same 3 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes less
Xi Lai Gaming same 4 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more

FUT vs VIT — head to head

0 of 1 series · 1 of 3 maps · last met 2026-08-01

Stats in these games

Round win rate 64 rounds too close to call on this sample 41% 59%
Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 33%27 attack rounds 54%37 attack rounds
Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 46%37 defense rounds 67%27 defense rounds
Pistol win rate pistols too close to call on this sample 2 of 6 4 of 6
FUT VIT
Estimate ranges
Round win rate-41 to +6 pts Attack round win rate-42 to +4 pts Defense round win rate-42 to +4 pts Pistol win rate-81 to +40 pts

Maps played

Lotus 6–13 2026-08-01 · VIT pick Haven 14–12 2026-08-01 · FUT pick Split 6–13 2026-08-01 · decider

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

Only one series played. No repeated veto choices.

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Fewer wins by defuse how rounds end -14 pts
FUT 38% 148 defence round wins VIT 52% 101 defence round wins
← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →
gap -26 to -1 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)
Players keep one agent structure +10 pts
FUT 61% 27 maps VIT 51% 19 maps
← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →
gap +3 to +17 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent
Higher headshot % texture +5 pts
FUT 30% 27 maps VIT 26% 19 maps
← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →
gap +2 to +7 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
team headshot %
Fewer role mixes structure -2.0
FUT 2.9 27 maps VIT 4.9 19 maps
← Fewer role mixesMore role mixes →
gap -3.1 to -0.9 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
different combinations of duelist, initiator, controller and sentinel counts, adjusted to the same number of maps
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Fewer wins by defusegap -26 to -1 ptsPlayers keep one agentgap +3 to +17Higher headshot %gap +2 to +7 ptsFewer role mixesgap -3.1 to -0.9

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More wins on the clock defence wins closed by the clock

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

100 Thieves 11% 133 defence round wins
Karmine Corp 9% 122 defence round wins
NRG 8% 125 defence round wins
JD Gaming 8% 161 defence round wins
T1 7% 153 defence round wins
Team Liquid 7% 170 defence round wins
Team Vitality 6% 101 defence round wins
Nongshim RedForce 6% 175 defence round wins
Xi Lai Gaming 6% 145 defence round wins
G2 Esports 5% 168 defence round wins
Global Esports 5% 173 defence round wins
TYLOO 4% 173 defence round wins
EDward Gaming 4% 132 defence round wins
LOUD 4% 143 defence round wins
Paper Rex 3% 109 defence round wins
FUT Esports 3% 148 defence round wins
Bars run from the field low (2.7%) to high (10.5%); rows are ordered by value.