G2 Esports · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None LOUD H2H · 4 maps 100T H2H · 3 maps EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	G2	XLG	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	54%	39%	+16	Different	145 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	28%	28%	-0	Same	24 maps
Top fragger takes less	21%	22%	-1	Same	24 maps
Kills concentrated	20.0	19.4	+0.6	Different	24 maps
Lower headshot %	25%	31%	-6	Different	19 maps
More assists per 100 kills	41.8	37.5	+4.4	Not settled	24 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against G2 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming	different	0 of 6	4 of 6	—
FUT Esports	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Global Esports	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp	same	2 of 6	3 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
LOUD	different	0 of 6	2 of 6	—
Nongshim RedForce	different	4 of 6	1 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
T1	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills
Team Liquid	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Team Vitality	different	5 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
TYLOO	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	different	2 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

More wins by defuse how rounds end +16 pts

G2 54% 168 defence round wins XLG 39% 145 defence round wins

← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →

gap +3 to +28 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)

Players keep one agent structure +15 pts

G2 58% 30 maps XLG 44% 24 maps

← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →

gap +6 to +23 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent

Lower headshot % texture -6 pts

G2 25% 30 maps XLG 31% 19 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap -8 to -4 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

More wins by defusegap +3 to +28 ptsPlayers keep one agentgap +6 to +23Lower headshot %gap -8 to -4 pts

G2 vs XLG: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have met outside this corpus

Shown for context only. These results are not in VCT 2026 Stage 2 and no number on this site counts them: not the ladder above, not the dimensions below, not the team's record.

L 1–2 G2 vs XLG 2026-06-14 · Valorant Masters London 2026 · Playoffs · Upper Quarterfinals · Bo3 Match page ↗

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More losses to detonation defence losses conceded to detonation

Varies more by map than by team.

Paper Rex 28% 103 defence round losses

Team Vitality 28% 104 defence round losses

Karmine Corp 22% 95 defence round losses

NRG 22% 132 defence round losses

G2 Esports 21% 166 defence round losses

LOUD 21% 142 defence round losses

FUT Esports 21% 154 defence round losses

T1 20% 145 defence round losses

Team Liquid 20% 110 defence round losses

Global Esports 19% 144 defence round losses

TYLOO 18% 145 defence round losses

Xi Lai Gaming 18% 120 defence round losses

100 Thieves 17% 92 defence round losses

EDward Gaming 16% 111 defence round losses

JD Gaming 16% 191 defence round losses

Nongshim RedForce 12% 148 defence round losses

Bars run from the field low (11.5%) to high (28.2%); rows are ordered by value.