G2 Esports · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None LOUD H2H · 4 maps 100T H2H · 3 maps EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	G2	LOUD	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	54%	46%	+8	Not settled	143 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	28%	34%	-6	Not settled	30 maps
Top fragger takes less	21%	25%	-4	Different	30 maps
Kills spread evenly	20.0	20.5	-0.4	Not settled	30 maps
Lower headshot %	25%	28%	-3	Different	30 maps
More assists per 100 kills	41.8	39.4	+2.5	Not settled	30 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against G2 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming	different	0 of 6	4 of 6	—
FUT Esports	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Global Esports	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp	same	2 of 6	3 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
LOUD	different	0 of 6	2 of 6	—
Nongshim RedForce	different	4 of 6	1 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
T1	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills
Team Liquid	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Kills spread evenly
Team Vitality	different	5 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
TYLOO	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	different	2 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less

G2 vs LOUD — head to head

0 of 2 series · 0 of 4 maps · last met 2026-09-05

Stats in these games

Round win rate 77 rounds gap -40 pts 30% 70%

Attack round win rate gap -39 pts 37%35 attack rounds 76%42 attack rounds

Defense round win rate gap -39 pts 24%42 defense rounds 63%35 defense rounds

Pistol win rate pistols too close to call on this sample 1 of 8 7 of 8

G2 LOUD

Estimate ranges

Round win rate-58 to -18 pts Attack round win rate-56 to -17 pts Defense round win rate-56 to -17 pts Pistol win rate-96 to -6 pts

Maps played

      
          Sunset
          13–15
          2026-08-08 · LOUD pick
        
          Lotus
          1–13
          2026-08-08 · G2 pick
        
          Abyss
          3–13
          2026-09-05 · G2 pick
        
          Summit
          6–13
          2026-09-05 · LOUD pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

LOUD banned Split in 2 of 2 series against G2

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Players keep one role structure +8 pts

G2 89% 30 maps LOUD 80% 31 maps

← Players change rolesPlayers keep one role →

gap +1 to +15 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main class

Top fragger takes less texture -4 pts

G2 21% 30 maps LOUD 25% 31 maps

← Top fragger takes lessTop fragger takes more →

gap -7 to -2 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

% of team kills taken by its top fragger

Lower headshot % texture -3 pts

G2 25% 30 maps LOUD 28% 31 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap -5 to -1 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Players keep one rolegap +1 to +15Top fragger takes lessgap -7 to -2 ptsLower headshot %gap -5 to -1 pts

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Wins rounds round win%

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Karmine Corp 58% 456 rounds

100 Thieves 57% 449 rounds

TYLOO 56% 643 rounds

Team Liquid 54% 559 rounds

Nongshim RedForce 54% 677 rounds

LOUD 54% 651 rounds

NRG 54% 454 rounds

Global Esports 53% 624 rounds

T1 53% 595 rounds

Team Vitality 53% 414 rounds

EDward Gaming 52% 468 rounds

G2 Esports 52% 642 rounds

Paper Rex 52% 415 rounds

Xi Lai Gaming 50% 498 rounds

FUT Esports 50% 580 rounds

JD Gaming 49% 726 rounds

Bars run from the field low (48.5%) to high (58.3%); rows are ordered by value.