All opponents 15 teams
How the two are built
Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
different role mix
Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.
| Dimension | G2 | FUT | Gap | Reading | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More wins by defuse | 54% | 38% | +16 | Different | 148 defence round wins |
| Opening kills spread | 28% | 35% | -7 | Not settled | 27 maps |
| Top fragger takes less | 21% | 23% | -2 | Not settled | 27 maps |
| Kills spread evenly | 20.0 | 20.1 | -0.1 | Same | 27 maps |
| Lower headshot % | 25% | 30% | -5 | Different | 27 maps |
| More assists per 100 kills | 41.8 | 36.8 | +5.0 | Different | 27 maps |
| “Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements. | |||||
How every other team is built against G2 15 teams
Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.
| Team | Role mix | Same | Different | Which ones match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Thieves | different | 3 of 6 | 2 of 6 | Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills spread evenly |
| EDward Gaming | different | 0 of 6 | 4 of 6 | — |
| FUT Esports | different | 1 of 6 | 3 of 6 | Kills spread evenly |
| Global Esports | different | 2 of 6 | 2 of 6 | Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly |
| JD Gaming | different | 1 of 6 | 2 of 6 | Kills spread evenly |
| Karmine Corp | same | 2 of 6 | 3 of 6 | More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread |
| LOUD | different | 0 of 6 | 2 of 6 | — |
| Nongshim RedForce | different | 4 of 6 | 1 of 6 | More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly |
| NRG | different | 3 of 6 | 2 of 6 | Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly |
| Paper Rex | different | 3 of 6 | 3 of 6 | Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly |
| T1 | different | 2 of 6 | 2 of 6 | Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills |
| Team Liquid | different | 1 of 6 | 3 of 6 | Kills spread evenly |
| Team Vitality | different | 5 of 6 | 0 of 6 | More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly |
| TYLOO | different | 1 of 6 | 4 of 6 | More assists per 100 kills |
| Xi Lai Gaming | different | 2 of 6 | 3 of 6 | Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less |
Pressure points
Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Uses unusual role mixes
structure
+34 pts
← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →
gap +7 to +61 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams
More wins by defuse
how rounds end
+16 pts
← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →
gap +4 to +29 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)
Lower headshot %
texture
-5 pts
← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →
gap -8 to -3 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
team headshot %
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Uses unusual role mixesgap +7 to +61More wins by defusegap +4 to +29 ptsLower headshot %gap -8 to -3 pts
G2 vs FUT: no head to head in Stage 2
They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.They have met outside this corpus
Shown for context only. These results are not in VCT 2026 Stage 2 and no number on this site counts them: not the ladder above, not the dimensions below, not the team's record.
L
0–2
G2 vs FUT
2026-06-15 · Valorant Masters London 2026 · Playoffs · Lower Round 1 · Bo3
Match page ↗
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered.
Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.
One dimension at a time
Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds
Wins defence rounds
Wins rounds
Attack-sided
Wins opening duels
Opening kills concentrated
Wins pistols
More wins by elimination
More wins by detonation
More wins by defuse
More wins on the clock
More losses to detonation
Converts more plants
Wins more retakes
Higher after a win
Higher after 2+ losses
Higher KAST
Higher damage per round
Higher headshot %
More assists per 100 kills
Kills concentrated
Top fragger takes more
Players keep one role
Players keep one agent
Repeats its role mix
Uses unusual role mixes
More distinct comps
More role mixes
Larger agent pool
More wins on the clock defence wins closed by the clock
This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.
100 Thieves
11%
133 defence round wins
Karmine Corp
9%
122 defence round wins
NRG
8%
125 defence round wins
JD Gaming
8%
161 defence round wins
T1
7%
153 defence round wins
Team Liquid
7%
170 defence round wins
Team Vitality
6%
101 defence round wins
Nongshim RedForce
6%
175 defence round wins
Xi Lai Gaming
6%
145 defence round wins
G2 Esports
5%
168 defence round wins
Global Esports
5%
173 defence round wins
TYLOO
4%
173 defence round wins
EDward Gaming
4%
132 defence round wins
LOUD
4%
143 defence round wins
Paper Rex
3%
109 defence round wins
FUT Esports
3%
148 defence round wins
Bars run from the field low (2.7%) to high (10.5%); rows are ordered by value.