playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

JD Gaming

JDG · China · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
6–8
Series
15–19
Maps
48%
Rounds · 726 rounds
51%
Attack · 374 attack rounds
46%
Defense · 352 defense rounds
JD Gaming scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None TYL H2H · 9 maps EDG H2H · 4 maps 100T none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.
Dimension JDG NS Gap Reading Sample
More wins by defuse 42% 35% +7 Not settled 161 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated 33% 26% +7 Not settled 32 maps
Top fragger takes more 23% 21% +2 Not settled 32 maps
Kills concentrated 20.2 20.1 +0.1 Same 32 maps
Higher headshot % 30% 27% +3 Different 30 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills 38.7 40.5 -1.8 Same 32 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against JDG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves same 2 of 6 2 of 6 Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
EDward Gaming different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports same 6 of 6 0 of 6 More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
G2 Esports different 1 of 6 2 of 6 Kills concentrated
Global Esports same 3 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Karmine Corp different 3 of 6 0 of 6 Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
LOUD different 3 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread
Nongshim RedForce same 2 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
NRG different 3 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex different 3 of 6 0 of 6 More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Kills concentrated
T1 same 3 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid same 5 of 6 0 of 6 Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
Team Vitality same 3 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
TYLOO same 2 of 6 0 of 6 More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Xi Lai Gaming same 3 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Higher headshot % texture +3 pts
JDG 30% 30 maps NS 27% 32 maps
← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →
gap +0 to +5 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
team headshot %
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Higher headshot %gap +0 to +5 pts

JDG vs NS: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Higher after 2+ losses P(win round | lost 2+ in a row)

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Karmine Corp 54% 84 rounds after 2+ losses
Team Vitality 49% 85 rounds after 2+ losses
Global Esports 49% 138 rounds after 2+ losses
T1 45% 142 rounds after 2+ losses
Nongshim RedForce 45% 154 rounds after 2+ losses
Paper Rex 45% 87 rounds after 2+ losses
TYLOO 44% 140 rounds after 2+ losses
LOUD 42% 147 rounds after 2+ losses
JD Gaming 41% 193 rounds after 2+ losses
FUT Esports 40% 154 rounds after 2+ losses
100 Thieves 40% 93 rounds after 2+ losses
Xi Lai Gaming 39% 123 rounds after 2+ losses
EDward Gaming 39% 111 rounds after 2+ losses
Team Liquid 38% 137 rounds after 2+ losses
G2 Esports 37% 147 rounds after 2+ losses
NRG 37% 104 rounds after 2+ losses
Bars run from the field low (36.5%) to high (53.6%); rows are ordered by value.