JD Gaming · Matchup · playbyplay

All opponents 15 teams

None TYL H2H · 9 maps EDG H2H · 4 maps 100T none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	JDG	EDG	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	42%	28%	+14	Different	132 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	33%	37%	-4	Not settled	22 maps
Top fragger takes less	23%	24%	-1	Same	22 maps
Kills spread evenly	20.2	20.3	-0.1	Same	22 maps
Higher headshot %	30%	29%	+1	Same	18 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills	38.7	44.5	-5.8	Different	22 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against JDG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
EDward Gaming	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports	same	6 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
G2 Esports	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Kills concentrated
Global Esports	same	3 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Karmine Corp	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
LOUD	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread
Nongshim RedForce	same	2 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Kills concentrated
T1	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid	same	5 of 6	0 of 6	Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
TYLOO	same	2 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Xi Lai Gaming	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills

JDG vs EDG — head to head

1 of 2 series · 2 of 4 maps · last met 2026-08-11

Stats in these games

Round win rate 84 rounds too close to call on this sample 51% 49%

Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 55%42 attack rounds 52%42 attack rounds

Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 48%42 defense rounds 45%42 defense rounds

Pistol win rate pistols too close to call on this sample 5 of 8 3 of 8

JDG EDG

Estimate ranges

Round win rate-19 to +23 pts Attack round win rate-18 to +23 pts Defense round win rate-18 to +23 pts Pistol win rate-39 to +73 pts

Maps played

Breeze 10–13 2026-07-19 · EDG pick Haven 7–13 2026-07-19 · JDG pick Breeze 13–6 2026-08-11 · EDG pick Summit 13–9 2026-08-11 · JDG pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

EDG banned Lotus in 2 of 2 series against JDG

EDG banned Split in 2 of 2 series against JDG

EDG picked Breeze in 2 of 2 series against JDG

JDG banned Ascent in 2 of 2 series against EDG

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Uses the usual role mix structure -55 pts

JDG 18% 34 maps EDG 73% 22 maps

← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →

gap -76 to -33 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams

More wins by defuse how rounds end +14 pts

JDG 42% 161 defence round wins EDG 28% 132 defence round wins

← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →

gap +2 to +27 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Uses the usual role mixgap -76 to -33More wins by defusegap +2 to +27 pts

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More distinct comps distinct 5-agent comps, resampled to a common exposure

Separates teams; a stable read.

Paper Rex 14.0 18 maps

Global Esports 11.1 29 maps

Team Vitality 10.6 19 maps

Nongshim RedForce 10.5 32 maps

Xi Lai Gaming 10.0 24 maps

G2 Esports 10.0 30 maps

FUT Esports 9.5 27 maps

T1 9.2 28 maps

NRG 9.2 22 maps

TYLOO 9.0 30 maps

EDward Gaming 9.0 22 maps

JD Gaming 8.8 34 maps

100 Thieves 8.4 21 maps

Team Liquid 8.1 27 maps

LOUD 7.1 31 maps

Karmine Corp 4.6 21 maps

Bars run from the field low (4.6) to high (14.0); rows are ordered by value.