JD Gaming · Matchup · playbyplay

All opponents 15 teams

None TYL H2H · 9 maps EDG H2H · 4 maps 100T none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.

Dimension	JDG	T1	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	42%	33%	+10	Not settled	153 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	33%	34%	-1	Same	28 maps
Top fragger takes more	23%	22%	+1	Same	28 maps
Kills concentrated	20.2	18.8	+1.4	Different	28 maps
Higher headshot %	30%	26%	+4	Different	27 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills	38.7	40.0	-1.3	Same	27 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against JDG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
EDward Gaming	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports	same	6 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
G2 Esports	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Kills concentrated
Global Esports	same	3 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Karmine Corp	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
LOUD	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread
Nongshim RedForce	same	2 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Kills concentrated
T1	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid	same	5 of 6	0 of 6	Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
TYLOO	same	2 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Xi Lai Gaming	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Higher headshot % texture +4 pts

JDG 30% 30 maps T1 26% 27 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap +2 to +6 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Fewer role mixes structure -1.6

JDG 3.0 34 maps T1 4.6 28 maps

← Fewer role mixesMore role mixes →

gap -2.7 to -0.4 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

different combinations of duelist, initiator, controller and sentinel counts, adjusted to the same number of maps

Kills concentrated texture +1.4

JDG 20.2 34 maps T1 18.8 28 maps

← Kills spread evenlyKills concentrated →

gap +0.8 to +2.0 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

kill-load concentration (100x Herfindahl over 5; even=20)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Higher headshot %gap +2 to +6 ptsFewer role mixesgap -2.7 to -0.4Kills concentratedgap +0.8 to +2.0

JDG vs T1: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More wins on the clock defence wins closed by the clock

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

100 Thieves 11% 133 defence round wins

Karmine Corp 9% 122 defence round wins

NRG 8% 125 defence round wins

JD Gaming 8% 161 defence round wins

T1 7% 153 defence round wins

Team Liquid 7% 170 defence round wins

Team Vitality 6% 101 defence round wins

Nongshim RedForce 6% 175 defence round wins

Xi Lai Gaming 6% 145 defence round wins

G2 Esports 5% 168 defence round wins

Global Esports 5% 173 defence round wins

TYLOO 4% 173 defence round wins

EDward Gaming 4% 132 defence round wins

LOUD 4% 143 defence round wins

Paper Rex 3% 109 defence round wins

FUT Esports 3% 148 defence round wins

Bars run from the field low (2.7%) to high (10.5%); rows are ordered by value.