Karmine Corp · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None TL H2H · 7 maps FUT H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	KC	TL	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	52%	32%	+20	Different	122 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	30%	34%	-4	Not settled	21 maps
Top fragger takes less	23%	24%	-1	Same	21 maps
Kills concentrated	20.4	20.0	+0.4	Not settled	21 maps
Higher headshot %	30%	30%	+1	Same	21 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills	34.6	37.4	-2.8	Not settled	21 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against KC 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	Top fragger takes more
EDward Gaming	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
FUT Esports	different	3 of 6	1 of 6	Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more
G2 Esports	same	2 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated
Global Esports	different	2 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread
JD Gaming	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
LOUD	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
Nongshim RedForce	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills concentrated
NRG	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills spread
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	0 of 6	Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated
T1	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid	different	2 of 6	1 of 6	Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes less
Team Vitality	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated
TYLOO	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
Xi Lai Gaming	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated

KC vs TL — head to head

2 of 2 series · 5 of 7 maps · last met 2026-08-30

Stats in these games

Round win rate 154 rounds too close to call on this sample 54% 46%

Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 53%78 attack rounds 45%76 attack rounds

Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 55%76 defense rounds 47%78 defense rounds

Pistol win rate 14 pistols too close to call on this sample 50% 50%

KC TL

Estimate ranges

Round win rate-8 to +23 pts Attack round win rate-8 to +23 pts Defense round win rate-8 to +23 pts Pistol win rate-46 to +46 pts

Maps played

Lotus 13–11 2026-08-02 · KC pick Summit 11–13 2026-08-02 · TL pick Haven 13–11 2026-08-02 · decider Sunset 13–7 2026-08-30 · KC pick Ascent 13–6 2026-08-30 · TL pick Lotus 7–13 2026-08-30 · KC pick Summit 13–10 2026-08-30 · TL pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

TL picked Summit in 2 of 2 series against KC

KC banned Split in 2 of 2 series against TL

KC picked Lotus in 2 of 2 series against TL

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

More wins by defuse how rounds end +20 pts

KC 52% 122 defence round wins TL 32% 170 defence round wins

← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →

gap +7 to +32 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)

Fewer distinct comps structure -3.5

KC 4.6 21 maps TL 8.1 27 maps

← Fewer distinct compsMore distinct comps →

gap -6.7 to -0.3 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

distinct 5-agent comps, resampled to a common exposure

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

More wins by defusegap +7 to +32 ptsFewer distinct compsgap -6.7 to -0.3

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Wins attack rounds attack round win%

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Karmine Corp 60% 239 attack rounds

NRG 60% 197 attack rounds

TYLOO 57% 325 attack rounds

Team Vitality 57% 209 attack rounds

LOUD 56% 366 attack rounds

T1 55% 297 attack rounds

100 Thieves 55% 224 attack rounds

G2 Esports 55% 308 attack rounds

Nongshim RedForce 54% 354 attack rounds

Paper Rex 53% 203 attack rounds

Global Esports 52% 307 attack rounds

FUT Esports 51% 278 attack rounds

JD Gaming 51% 374 attack rounds

EDward Gaming 50% 225 attack rounds

Team Liquid 48% 279 attack rounds

Xi Lai Gaming 45% 233 attack rounds

Bars run from the field low (45.1%) to high (60.3%); rows are ordered by value.