T1 · Matchup · playbyplay

All opponents 15 teams

None GE H2H · 4 maps PRX H2H · 3 maps NS H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	T1	NRG	Gap	Reading	Sample
Fewer wins by defuse	33%	40%	-7	Not settled	125 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated	34%	32%	+2	Same	22 maps
Top fragger takes more	22%	21%	+1	Same	22 maps
Kills spread evenly	18.8	20.1	-1.3	Different	22 maps
Lower headshot %	26%	26%	-1	Same	22 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills	40.0	47.7	-7.7	Different	22 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against T1 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	4 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
EDward Gaming	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
FUT Esports	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
G2 Esports	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
Global Esports	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
JD Gaming	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
Karmine Corp	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	Top fragger takes less
LOUD	different	2 of 6	4 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated
Nongshim RedForce	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Paper Rex	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more
TYLOO	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Top fragger takes more

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Uses the usual role mix structure -30 pts

T1 25% 28 maps NRG 55% 22 maps

← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →

gap -52 to -8 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams

Fewer assists per 100 kills texture -7.7

T1 40.0 27 maps NRG 47.7 22 maps

← Fewer assists per 100 killsMore assists per 100 kills →

gap -14.2 to -1.3 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

assists per 100 kills (utility-dense play)

Kills spread evenly texture -1.3

T1 18.8 28 maps NRG 20.1 22 maps

← Kills spread evenlyKills concentrated →

gap -1.9 to -0.7 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

kill-load concentration (100x Herfindahl over 5; even=20)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Uses the usual role mixgap -52 to -8Fewer assists per 100 killsgap -14.2 to -1.3Kills spread evenlygap -1.9 to -0.7

T1 vs NRG: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Wins defence rounds defence round win%

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Team Liquid 61% 280 defence rounds

100 Thieves 59% 225 defence rounds

Karmine Corp 56% 217 defence rounds

Xi Lai Gaming 55% 265 defence rounds

Global Esports 55% 317 defence rounds

TYLOO 54% 318 defence rounds

EDward Gaming 54% 243 defence rounds

Nongshim RedForce 54% 323 defence rounds

Paper Rex 51% 212 defence rounds

T1 51% 298 defence rounds

G2 Esports 50% 334 defence rounds

LOUD 50% 285 defence rounds

Team Vitality 49% 205 defence rounds

FUT Esports 49% 302 defence rounds

NRG 49% 257 defence rounds

JD Gaming 46% 352 defence rounds

Bars run from the field low (45.7%) to high (60.7%); rows are ordered by value.