T1 · Matchup · playbyplay

All opponents 15 teams

None GE H2H · 4 maps PRX H2H · 3 maps NS H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.

Dimension	T1	GE	Gap	Reading	Sample
Fewer wins by defuse	33%	43%	-10	Not settled	153 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated	34%	32%	+2	Same	28 maps
Top fragger takes more	22%	22%	+0	Same	28 maps
Kills spread evenly	18.8	20.2	-1.4	Different	28 maps
Lower headshot %	26%	28%	-2	Different	27 maps
More assists per 100 kills	40.0	35.9	+4.1	Not settled	27 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against T1 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	4 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
EDward Gaming	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
FUT Esports	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
G2 Esports	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
Global Esports	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
JD Gaming	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
Karmine Corp	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	Top fragger takes less
LOUD	different	2 of 6	4 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated
Nongshim RedForce	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more
NRG	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Paper Rex	different	1 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes more
Team Liquid	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more
TYLOO	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Top fragger takes more

T1 vs GE — head to head

0 of 1 series · 1 of 4 maps · last met 2026-09-05

Stats in these games

Round win rate 82 rounds too close to call on this sample 40% 60%

Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 44%36 attack rounds 63%46 attack rounds

Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 37%46 defense rounds 56%36 defense rounds

Pistol win rate pistols too close to call on this sample 3 of 8 5 of 8

T1 GE

Estimate ranges

Round win rate-39 to +2 pts Attack round win rate-38 to +3 pts Defense round win rate-38 to +3 pts Pistol win rate-73 to +39 pts

Maps played

Split 5–13 2026-09-05 · GE pick Lotus 13–10 2026-09-05 · T1 pick Ascent 5–13 2026-09-05 · GE pick Haven 10–13 2026-09-05 · T1 pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

Only one series played. No repeated veto choices.

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Players keep one agent structure +12 pts

T1 51% 28 maps GE 39% 29 maps

← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →

gap +1 to +22 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent

Lower headshot % texture -2 pts

T1 26% 27 maps GE 28% 29 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap -5 to -0 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Kills spread evenly texture -1.4

T1 18.8 28 maps GE 20.2 29 maps

← Kills spread evenlyKills concentrated →

gap -2.0 to -0.7 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

kill-load concentration (100x Herfindahl over 5; even=20)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Players keep one agentgap +1 to +22Lower headshot %gap -5 to -0 ptsKills spread evenlygap -2.0 to -0.7

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More role mixes different combinations of duelist, initiator, controller and sentinel counts, adjusted to the same number of maps

Separates teams; a stable read.

NRG 5.0 22 maps

Global Esports 4.9 29 maps

Team Vitality 4.9 19 maps

TYLOO 4.6 30 maps

T1 4.6 28 maps

G2 Esports 4.5 30 maps

EDward Gaming 4.0 22 maps

Paper Rex 4.0 18 maps

LOUD 4.0 31 maps

Team Liquid 3.3 27 maps

JD Gaming 3.0 34 maps

Xi Lai Gaming 3.0 24 maps

FUT Esports 2.9 27 maps

100 Thieves 2.9 21 maps

Karmine Corp 2.0 21 maps

Nongshim RedForce 2.0 32 maps

Bars run from the field low (2.0) to high (5.0); rows are ordered by value.