playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

LOUD

LOUD · Americas · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
7–4
Series
18–13
Maps
54%
Rounds · 651 rounds
56%
Attack · 366 attack rounds
50%
Defense · 285 defense rounds
LOUD scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None NRG H2H · 8 maps 100T H2H · 7 maps G2 H2H · 4 maps EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.
Dimension LOUD TYL Gap Reading Sample
More wins by defuse 46% 41% +5 Same 143 defence round wins
Opening kills spread 34% 39% -6 Not settled 30 maps
Top fragger takes more 25% 24% +1 Same 30 maps
Kills concentrated 20.5 20.4 +0.0 Same 30 maps
Lower headshot % 28% 31% -3 Different 27 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills 39.4 41.0 -1.7 Same 30 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against LOUD 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves different 0 of 6 1 of 6 —
EDward Gaming different 4 of 6 2 of 6 Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
FUT Esports different 1 of 6 1 of 6 Opening kills spread
G2 Esports different 0 of 6 2 of 6 —
Global Esports different 3 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Opening kills concentrated
JD Gaming different 3 of 6 0 of 6 More wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated
Karmine Corp different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Kills concentrated
Nongshim RedForce different 2 of 6 1 of 6 Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
NRG different 2 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated
Paper Rex different 1 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse
T1 different 2 of 6 4 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread
Team Liquid different 3 of 6 1 of 6 More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Team Vitality different 2 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills
TYLOO different 4 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Xi Lai Gaming different 1 of 6 3 of 6 More assists per 100 kills

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Players keep one agent structure +16 pts
LOUD 61% 31 maps TYL 46% 30 maps
← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →
gap +2 to +29 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent
Lower headshot % texture -3 pts
LOUD 28% 31 maps TYL 31% 27 maps
← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →
gap -5 to -1 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
team headshot %
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Players keep one agentgap +2 to +29Lower headshot %gap -5 to -1 pts

LOUD vs TYL: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More wins on the clock defence wins closed by the clock

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

100 Thieves 11% 133 defence round wins
Karmine Corp 9% 122 defence round wins
NRG 8% 125 defence round wins
JD Gaming 8% 161 defence round wins
T1 7% 153 defence round wins
Team Liquid 7% 170 defence round wins
Team Vitality 6% 101 defence round wins
Nongshim RedForce 6% 175 defence round wins
Xi Lai Gaming 6% 145 defence round wins
G2 Esports 5% 168 defence round wins
Global Esports 5% 173 defence round wins
TYLOO 4% 173 defence round wins
EDward Gaming 4% 132 defence round wins
LOUD 4% 143 defence round wins
Paper Rex 3% 109 defence round wins
FUT Esports 3% 148 defence round wins
Bars run from the field low (2.7%) to high (10.5%); rows are ordered by value.