playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

NRG

NRG · Americas · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
6–2
Series
14–8
Maps
54%
Rounds · 454 rounds
60%
Attack · 197 attack rounds
49%
Defense · 257 defense rounds
NRG scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None LOUD H2H · 8 maps 100T H2H · 2 maps EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.
Dimension NRG EDG Gap Reading Sample
More wins by defuse 40% 28% +12 Not settled 125 defence round wins
Opening kills spread 32% 37% -5 Not settled 22 maps
Top fragger takes less 21% 24% -3 Different 22 maps
Kills spread evenly 20.1 20.3 -0.2 Same 22 maps
Lower headshot % 26% 29% -2 Different 18 maps
More assists per 100 kills 47.7 44.5 +3.3 Not settled 22 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against NRG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves different 2 of 6 1 of 6 Higher headshot % · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming same 1 of 6 2 of 6 Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports different 3 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
G2 Esports different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Global Esports different 4 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp different 1 of 6 2 of 6 Opening kills concentrated
LOUD different 2 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
Nongshim RedForce different 4 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
T1 different 3 of 6 2 of 6 Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid different 2 of 6 3 of 6 Opening kills spread · Kills concentrated
Team Vitality different 4 of 6 1 of 6 Higher headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
TYLOO different 1 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse
Xi Lai Gaming different 3 of 6 3 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Top fragger takes less texture -3 pts
NRG 21% 22 maps EDG 24% 22 maps
← Top fragger takes lessTop fragger takes more →
gap -5 to -0 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
% of team kills taken by its top fragger
Lower headshot % texture -2 pts
NRG 26% 22 maps EDG 29% 18 maps
← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →
gap -5 to -0 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
team headshot %
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Top fragger takes lessgap -5 to -0 ptsLower headshot %gap -5 to -0 pts

NRG vs EDG: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Higher after 2+ losses P(win round | lost 2+ in a row)

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Karmine Corp 54% 84 rounds after 2+ losses
Team Vitality 49% 85 rounds after 2+ losses
Global Esports 49% 138 rounds after 2+ losses
T1 45% 142 rounds after 2+ losses
Nongshim RedForce 45% 154 rounds after 2+ losses
Paper Rex 45% 87 rounds after 2+ losses
TYLOO 44% 140 rounds after 2+ losses
LOUD 42% 147 rounds after 2+ losses
JD Gaming 41% 193 rounds after 2+ losses
FUT Esports 40% 154 rounds after 2+ losses
100 Thieves 40% 93 rounds after 2+ losses
Xi Lai Gaming 39% 123 rounds after 2+ losses
EDward Gaming 39% 111 rounds after 2+ losses
Team Liquid 38% 137 rounds after 2+ losses
G2 Esports 37% 147 rounds after 2+ losses
NRG 37% 104 rounds after 2+ losses
Bars run from the field low (36.5%) to high (53.6%); rows are ordered by value.