playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

Team Liquid

TL · EMEA · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
7–4
Series
17–10
Maps
54%
Rounds · 559 rounds
48%
Attack · 279 attack rounds
61%
Defense · 280 defense rounds
Team Liquid scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None KC H2H · 7 maps FUT H2H · 5 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.
Dimension TL FUT Gap Reading Sample
Fewer wins by defuse 32% 38% -6 Same 148 defence round wins
Opening kills spread 34% 35% -1 Same 27 maps
Top fragger takes more 24% 23% +1 Not settled 27 maps
Kills spread evenly 20.0 20.1 -0.1 Same 27 maps
Lower headshot % 30% 30% -1 Same 27 maps
More assists per 100 kills 37.4 36.8 +0.6 Same 27 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against TL 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves same 2 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming different 4 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
FUT Esports same 5 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
G2 Esports different 1 of 6 3 of 6 Kills concentrated
Global Esports same 3 of 6 0 of 6 More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming same 5 of 6 0 of 6 Lower headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp different 2 of 6 1 of 6 Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes more
LOUD different 3 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less
Nongshim RedForce same 2 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Kills spread evenly
NRG different 2 of 6 3 of 6 Opening kills concentrated · Kills spread evenly
Paper Rex different 3 of 6 1 of 6 Lower headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Kills spread evenly
T1 same 2 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated
Team Vitality same 2 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Kills spread evenly
TYLOO same 1 of 6 0 of 6 Top fragger takes more
Xi Lai Gaming same 1 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills

TL vs FUT — head to head

1 of 2 series · 3 of 5 maps · last met 2026-08-29

Stats in these games

Round win rate 110 rounds too close to call on this sample 55% 45%
Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 46%56 attack rounds 35%54 attack rounds
Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 65%54 defense rounds 54%56 defense rounds
Pistol win rate pistols too close to call on this sample 8 of 10 2 of 10
TL FUT
Estimate ranges
Round win rate-8 to +29 pts Attack round win rate-7 to +28 pts Defense round win rate-7 to +28 pts Pistol win rate-2 to +89 pts

Maps played

Haven 11–13 2026-08-21 · FUT pick Summit 11–13 2026-08-21 · TL pick Split 13–5 2026-08-29 · TL pick Ascent 13–8 2026-08-29 · FUT pick Lotus 13–10 2026-08-29 · TL pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

FUT banned Abyss in 2 of 2 series against TL

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
No differences highlighted at this sample. Across all 13 dimensions the estimate ranges overlap. That is a real finding about a close matchup, not missing data.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More wins on the clock defence wins closed by the clock

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

100 Thieves 11% 133 defence round wins
Karmine Corp 9% 122 defence round wins
NRG 8% 125 defence round wins
JD Gaming 8% 161 defence round wins
T1 7% 153 defence round wins
Team Liquid 7% 170 defence round wins
Team Vitality 6% 101 defence round wins
Nongshim RedForce 6% 175 defence round wins
Xi Lai Gaming 6% 145 defence round wins
G2 Esports 5% 168 defence round wins
Global Esports 5% 173 defence round wins
TYLOO 4% 173 defence round wins
EDward Gaming 4% 132 defence round wins
LOUD 4% 143 defence round wins
Paper Rex 3% 109 defence round wins
FUT Esports 3% 148 defence round wins
Bars run from the field low (2.7%) to high (10.5%); rows are ordered by value.