playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

Team Vitality

VIT · EMEA · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
4–3
Series
10–9
Maps
53%
Rounds · 414 rounds
57%
Attack · 209 attack rounds
49%
Defense · 205 defense rounds
Team Vitality scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams
None FUT H2H · 3 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.
Dimension VIT G2 Gap Reading Sample
Fewer wins by defuse 52% 54% -3 Same 101 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated 30% 28% +2 Same 19 maps
Top fragger takes more 22% 21% +1 Same 19 maps
Kills concentrated 20.1 20.0 +0.1 Same 19 maps
Higher headshot % 26% 25% +1 Same 19 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills 39.5 41.8 -2.3 Not settled 19 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against VIT 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves same 3 of 6 2 of 6 Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming different 1 of 6 3 of 6 Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports same 2 of 6 2 of 6 Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
G2 Esports different 5 of 6 0 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Global Esports same 3 of 6 1 of 6 Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming same 3 of 6 1 of 6 More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp different 2 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
LOUD different 2 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills
Nongshim RedForce same 4 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
NRG different 4 of 6 1 of 6 Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex different 3 of 6 1 of 6 Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
T1 same 3 of 6 2 of 6 Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid same 2 of 6 3 of 6 More assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
TYLOO same 1 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming same 3 of 6 3 of 6 More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Uses the usual role mix structure -42 pts
VIT 21% 19 maps G2 64% 30 maps
← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →
gap -61 to -24 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams
Players change agents structure -7 pts
VIT 51% 19 maps G2 58% 30 maps
← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →
gap -14 to -0 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Uses the usual role mixgap -61 to -24Players change agentsgap -14 to -0

VIT vs G2: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.
Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Attack-sided attack minus defence round win% (pp)

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

NRG 11.3 pp 454 rounds
Team Vitality 7.6 pp 414 rounds
LOUD 6.1 pp 651 rounds
JD Gaming 5.4 pp 726 rounds
G2 Esports 4.2 pp 642 rounds
Karmine Corp 4.1 pp 456 rounds
T1 3.9 pp 595 rounds
TYLOO 2.5 pp 643 rounds
FUT Esports 2.1 pp 580 rounds
Paper Rex 1.3 pp 415 rounds
Nongshim RedForce 0.0 pp 677 rounds
Global Esports -2.5 pp 624 rounds
EDward Gaming -4.1 pp 468 rounds
100 Thieves -4.2 pp 449 rounds
Xi Lai Gaming -9.6 pp 498 rounds
Team Liquid -12.7 pp 559 rounds
Bars run from the field low (-12.7 pp) to high (11.3 pp); rows are ordered by value.