Team Vitality · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None FUT H2H · 3 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TYL none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 XLG none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.

Dimension	VIT	XLG	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	52%	39%	+13	Different	101 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated	30%	28%	+1	Same	19 maps
Top fragger takes less	22%	22%	-0	Same	19 maps
Kills concentrated	20.1	19.4	+0.7	Different	19 maps
Lower headshot %	26%	31%	-5	Different	19 maps
More assists per 100 kills	39.5	37.5	+2.0	Same	19 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against VIT 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Lower headshot % · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
EDward Gaming	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Kills spread evenly
FUT Esports	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Top fragger takes less · Kills concentrated
G2 Esports	different	5 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Global Esports	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
JD Gaming	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Kills spread evenly
Karmine Corp	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread
LOUD	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills
Nongshim RedForce	same	4 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
NRG	different	4 of 6	1 of 6	Lower headshot % · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
Paper Rex	different	3 of 6	1 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
T1	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid	same	2 of 6	3 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Kills concentrated
TYLOO	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	same	3 of 6	3 of 6	More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes less

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Uses the usual role mix structure -37 pts

VIT 21% 19 maps XLG 58% 24 maps

← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →

gap -52 to -21 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams

More wins by defuse how rounds end +13 pts

VIT 52% 101 defence round wins XLG 39% 145 defence round wins

← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →

gap +0 to +25 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)

Players keep one agent structure +8 pts

VIT 51% 19 maps XLG 44% 24 maps

← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →

gap +3 to +12 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent

Lower headshot % texture -5 pts

VIT 26% 19 maps XLG 31% 19 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap -7 to -3 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Kills concentrated texture +0.7

VIT 20.1 19 maps XLG 19.4 24 maps

← Kills spread evenlyKills concentrated →

gap +0.1 to +1.3 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

kill-load concentration (100x Herfindahl over 5; even=20)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Uses the usual role mixgap -52 to -21More wins by defusegap +0 to +25 ptsPlayers keep one agentgap +3 to +12Lower headshot %gap -7 to -3 ptsKills concentratedgap +0.1 to +1.3

VIT vs XLG: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

More wins by detonation attack wins closed by detonation

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Nongshim RedForce 25% 192 attack round wins

100 Thieves 24% 123 attack round wins

G2 Esports 24% 168 attack round wins

LOUD 21% 206 attack round wins

JD Gaming 21% 191 attack round wins

FUT Esports 20% 142 attack round wins

NRG 20% 118 attack round wins

Team Vitality 19% 119 attack round wins

Paper Rex 19% 107 attack round wins

Team Liquid 18% 134 attack round wins

TYLOO 18% 185 attack round wins

T1 18% 164 attack round wins

Karmine Corp 17% 144 attack round wins

Xi Lai Gaming 16% 105 attack round wins

Global Esports 15% 160 attack round wins

EDward Gaming 9% 113 attack round wins

Bars run from the field low (8.8%) to high (24.5%); rows are ordered by value.