TYLOO · Matchup · playbyplay

All opponents 15 teams

None JDG H2H · 9 maps EDG H2H · 3 maps XLG H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.

Dimension	TYL	JDG	Gap	Reading	Sample
Fewer wins by defuse	41%	42%	-1	Same	161 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated	39%	33%	+6	Not settled	30 maps
Top fragger takes more	24%	23%	+1	Same	30 maps
Kills concentrated	20.4	20.2	+0.3	Not settled	30 maps
Higher headshot %	31%	30%	+1	Not settled	27 maps
More assists per 100 kills	41.0	38.7	+2.3	Not settled	30 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against TYL 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
EDward Gaming	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
FUT Esports	same	3 of 6	0 of 6	More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes more
G2 Esports	different	1 of 6	4 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Global Esports	same	1 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse
JD Gaming	same	2 of 6	0 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Top fragger takes more
Karmine Corp	different	3 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Top fragger takes more · Kills concentrated
LOUD	different	4 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less · Kills spread evenly
Nongshim RedForce	same	2 of 6	3 of 6	More wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills
NRG	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	More wins by defuse
Paper Rex	different	2 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot %
T1	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Team Liquid	same	1 of 6	0 of 6	Top fragger takes less
Team Vitality	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Xi Lai Gaming	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Higher headshot %

TYL vs JDG — head to head

2 of 3 series · 6 of 9 maps · last met 2026-08-23

Stats in these games

Round win rate 183 rounds too close to call on this sample 55% 45%

Attack round win rate too close to call on this sample 60%94 attack rounds 51%89 attack rounds

Defense round win rate too close to call on this sample 49%89 defense rounds 40%94 defense rounds

Pistol win rate 18 pistols too close to call on this sample 72% 28%

TYL JDG

Estimate ranges

Round win rate-5 to +23 pts Attack round win rate-5 to +23 pts Defense round win rate-5 to +23 pts Pistol win rate-2 to +75 pts

Maps played

Split 13–8 2026-07-10 · TYL pick Sunset 13–7 2026-07-10 · JDG pick Breeze 7–13 2026-08-19 · TYL pick Summit 13–10 2026-08-19 · JDG pick Ascent 9–13 2026-08-19 · decider Lotus 6–13 2026-08-23 · JDG pick Split 13–7 2026-08-23 · TYL pick Breeze 13–10 2026-08-23 · JDG pick Summit 13–2 2026-08-23 · TYL pick

Repeated veto choices in this matchup

JDG banned Sunset in 2 of 3 series against TYL

JDG banned Haven in 2 of 3 series against TYL

TYL picked Split in 2 of 3 series against JDG

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Uses unusual role mixes structure +39 pts

TYL 57% 30 maps JDG 18% 34 maps

← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →

gap +13 to +66 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams

More role mixes structure +1.6

TYL 4.6 30 maps JDG 3.0 34 maps

← Fewer role mixesMore role mixes →

gap +0.5 to +2.7 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

different combinations of duelist, initiator, controller and sentinel counts, adjusted to the same number of maps

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Uses unusual role mixesgap +13 to +66More role mixesgap +0.5 to +2.7

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Wins more retakes retakes won

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Nongshim RedForce 78% 78 retakes

Karmine Corp 75% 84 retakes

TYLOO 73% 97 retakes

Xi Lai Gaming 73% 77 retakes

Global Esports 73% 102 retakes

G2 Esports 72% 126 retakes

Team Liquid 71% 76 retakes

100 Thieves 71% 55 retakes

JD Gaming 69% 98 retakes

LOUD 69% 96 retakes

EDward Gaming 67% 55 retakes

Team Vitality 64% 81 retakes

FUT Esports 64% 88 retakes

NRG 63% 79 retakes

T1 63% 79 retakes

Paper Rex 61% 74 retakes

Bars run from the field low (60.8%) to high (78.2%); rows are ordered by value.