playbyplay
Champions 2026 scoutStage 2 evidence · 16 teams · 133 series · 334 maps · 7138 rounds
Primary navigation

Xi Lai Gaming

XLG · China · VCT 2026 Stage 2
Team record
5–4
Series
14–10
Maps
50%
Rounds · 498 rounds
45%
Attack · 233 attack rounds
55%
Defense · 265 defense rounds
Xi Lai Gaming scouting sections
All opponents 15 teams

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions
same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.
Dimension XLG 100T Gap Reading Sample
More wins by defuse 39% 29% +9 Not settled 133 defence round wins
Opening kills spread 28% 38% -10 Different 21 maps
Top fragger takes less 22% 23% -1 Same 21 maps
Kills spread evenly 19.4 20.2 -0.7 Different 21 maps
Higher headshot % 31% 26% +5 Different 19 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills 37.5 42.0 -4.5 Not settled 21 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.
How every other team is built against XLG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team Role mix Same Different Which ones match
100 Thieves same 1 of 6 3 of 6 Top fragger takes less
EDward Gaming different 0 of 6 3 of 6 —
FUT Esports same 4 of 6 1 of 6 More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
G2 Esports different 2 of 6 3 of 6 Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Global Esports same 4 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
JD Gaming same 3 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
Karmine Corp different 2 of 6 2 of 6 Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread
LOUD different 1 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills
Nongshim RedForce same 3 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
NRG different 3 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Paper Rex different 5 of 6 1 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
T1 same 2 of 6 2 of 6 More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid same 1 of 6 2 of 6 More assists per 100 kills
Team Vitality same 3 of 6 3 of 6 Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
TYLOO same 2 of 6 2 of 6 Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot %

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.
Uses unusual role mixes structure +39 pts
XLG 58% 24 maps 100T 19% 21 maps
← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →
gap +21 to +58 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams
Changes its role mix structure -39 pts
XLG 42% 24 maps 100T 81% 21 maps
← Changes its role mixRepeats its role mix →
gap -56 to -21 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
share of maps using their most common role mix: the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels
Players change agents structure -31 pts
XLG 44% 24 maps 100T 74% 21 maps
← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →
gap -37 to -24 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent
Players change roles structure -11 pts
XLG 86% 24 maps 100T 96% 21 maps
← Players change rolesPlayers keep one role →
gap -14 to -7 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
mean share of a player's maps spent on their main class
Opening kills spread openers -10 pts
XLG 28% 24 maps 100T 38% 21 maps
← Opening kills spreadOpening kills concentrated →
gap -17 to -2 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean
% of team first-kills taken by its top entry
Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.
Estimate ranges
Uses unusual role mixesgap +21 to +58Changes its role mixgap -56 to -21Players change agentsgap -37 to -24Players change rolesgap -14 to -7Opening kills spreadgap -17 to -2 pts

XLG vs 100T: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.
They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Higher after a win P(win round | won previous)

This dimension does not separate teams. A team's position here moves between samples, so the order below is not a standing. It is shown because a flat dimension is a finding, and dimmed everywhere else on the site for the same reason.

Team Liquid 69% 268 rounds after a win
100 Thieves 69% 224 rounds after a win
TYLOO 67% 313 rounds after a win
Karmine Corp 66% 230 rounds after a win
EDward Gaming 65% 220 rounds after a win
T1 64% 281 rounds after a win
NRG 64% 212 rounds after a win
Nongshim RedForce 64% 326 rounds after a win
LOUD 63% 306 rounds after a win
Xi Lai Gaming 62% 223 rounds after a win
G2 Esports 62% 298 rounds after a win
FUT Esports 62% 252 rounds after a win
Global Esports 61% 293 rounds after a win
Team Vitality 61% 200 rounds after a win
Paper Rex 60% 186 rounds after a win
JD Gaming 58% 317 rounds after a win
Bars run from the field low (57.7%) to high (69.4%); rows are ordered by value.