Xi Lai Gaming · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None TYL H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

same role mix Their most-used lineups have the same numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels.

Dimension	XLG	FUT	Gap	Reading	Sample
More wins by defuse	39%	38%	+1	Same	145 defence round wins
Opening kills spread	28%	35%	-7	Not settled	24 maps
Top fragger takes less	22%	23%	-1	Same	24 maps
Kills spread evenly	19.4	20.1	-0.7	Different	24 maps
Higher headshot %	31%	30%	+0	Same	19 maps
More assists per 100 kills	37.5	36.8	+0.6	Same	24 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against XLG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	1 of 6	3 of 6	Top fragger takes less
EDward Gaming	different	0 of 6	3 of 6	—
FUT Esports	same	4 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
G2 Esports	different	2 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Global Esports	same	4 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
JD Gaming	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
Karmine Corp	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread
LOUD	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Nongshim RedForce	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
NRG	different	3 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Paper Rex	different	5 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
T1	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
TYLOO	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot %

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Uses unusual role mixes structure +28 pts

XLG 58% 24 maps FUT 30% 27 maps

← Uses the usual role mixUses unusual role mixes →

gap +5 to +52 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

share of maps using a different role mix from the most common one on that map among the 16 teams

Players change agents structure -18 pts

XLG 44% 24 maps FUT 61% 27 maps

← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →

gap -26 to -9 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent

Kills spread evenly texture -0.7

XLG 19.4 24 maps FUT 20.1 27 maps

← Kills spread evenlyKills concentrated →

gap -1.3 to -0.1 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

kill-load concentration (100x Herfindahl over 5; even=20)

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Uses unusual role mixesgap +5 to +52Players change agentsgap -26 to -9Kills spread evenlygap -1.3 to -0.1

XLG vs FUT: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Wins opening duels share of opening duels won

Varies more by map than by team.

Karmine Corp 57% 454 opening duels

TYLOO 56% 576 opening duels

Xi Lai Gaming 54% 391 opening duels

100 Thieves 53% 448 opening duels

T1 53% 576 opening duels

Team Vitality 52% 412 opening duels

NRG 52% 451 opening duels

FUT Esports 52% 580 opening duels

LOUD 51% 648 opening duels

Team Liquid 50% 559 opening duels

Global Esports 50% 624 opening duels

G2 Esports 50% 642 opening duels

Paper Rex 50% 415 opening duels

Nongshim RedForce 49% 677 opening duels

EDward Gaming 47% 385 opening duels

JD Gaming 46% 660 opening duels

Bars run from the field low (46.4%) to high (57.3%); rows are ordered by value.