Xi Lai Gaming · Matchup

All opponents 15 teams

None TYL H2H · 2 maps 100T none in Stage 2 EDG none in Stage 2 FUT none in Stage 2 G2 none in Stage 2 GE none in Stage 2 JDG none in Stage 2 KC none in Stage 2 LOUD none in Stage 2 NRG none in Stage 2 NS none in Stage 2 PRX none in Stage 2 T1 none in Stage 2 TL none in Stage 2 VIT none in Stage 2

How the two are built

Agent roles and six team stats. 6 of the fingerprint's dimensions

different role mix Their most-used lineups have different numbers of duelists, initiators, controllers or sentinels.

Dimension	XLG	G2	Gap	Reading	Sample
Fewer wins by defuse	39%	54%	-16	Different	145 defence round wins
Opening kills concentrated	28%	28%	+0	Same	24 maps
Top fragger takes more	22%	21%	+1	Same	24 maps
Kills spread evenly	19.4	20.0	-0.6	Different	24 maps
Higher headshot %	31%	25%	+6	Different	19 maps
Fewer assists per 100 kills	37.5	41.8	-4.4	Not settled	24 maps
“Not settled” means this sample does not separate the two values. The sample column is the smaller of the two teams' samples, in the unit that dimension counts, because a comparison is only as strong as its thinner side. These dimensions are not all independent: the structure ones restate how rigid a lineup is from different angles and move together, so read them as one family rather than as separate agreements.

How every other team is built against XLG 15 teams

Role mix = the number of duelists, initiators, controllers and sentinels in a lineup.

Team	Role mix	Same	Different	Which ones match
100 Thieves	same	1 of 6	3 of 6	Top fragger takes less
EDward Gaming	different	0 of 6	3 of 6	—
FUT Esports	same	4 of 6	1 of 6	More wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Top fragger takes less
G2 Esports	different	2 of 6	3 of 6	Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
Global Esports	same	4 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes less
JD Gaming	same	3 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · Fewer assists per 100 kills
Karmine Corp	different	2 of 6	2 of 6	Higher headshot % · Opening kills spread
LOUD	different	1 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills
Nongshim RedForce	same	3 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
NRG	different	3 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
Paper Rex	different	5 of 6	1 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Higher headshot % · More assists per 100 kills · Opening kills concentrated · Top fragger takes more
T1	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	More wins by defuse · Top fragger takes less
Team Liquid	same	1 of 6	2 of 6	More assists per 100 kills
Team Vitality	same	3 of 6	3 of 6	Fewer assists per 100 kills · Opening kills spread · Top fragger takes more
TYLOO	same	2 of 6	2 of 6	Fewer wins by defuse · Lower headshot %

Pressure points

Differences supported by the teams' full samples.

Fewer wins by defuse how rounds end -16 pts

XLG 39% 145 defence round wins G2 54% 168 defence round wins

← Fewer wins by defuseMore wins by defuse →

gap -28 to -3 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

defence wins closed by defuse (retake identity)

Players change agents structure -15 pts

XLG 44% 24 maps G2 58% 30 maps

← Players change agentsPlayers keep one agent →

gap -23 to -6 · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

mean share of a player's maps spent on their main agent

Higher headshot % texture +6 pts

XLG 31% 19 maps G2 25% 30 maps

← Lower headshot %Higher headshot % →

gap +4 to +8 pts · bar length is each team's position on that axis against the sixteen-team field; the hairline is the field mean

team headshot %

Bars show each team from the field low to high; the hairline marks the sixteen-team field mean.

Estimate ranges

Fewer wins by defusegap -28 to -3 ptsPlayers change agentsgap -23 to -6Higher headshot %gap +4 to +8 pts

XLG vs G2: no head to head in Stage 2

They have not met inside VCT 2026 Stage 2, the scope every number on this site is drawn from. Any earlier meetings are outside it and are not counted here.

They have met outside this corpus

Shown for context only. These results are not in VCT 2026 Stage 2 and no number on this site counts them: not the ladder above, not the dimensions below, not the team's record.

W 2–1 XLG vs G2 2026-06-14 · Valorant Masters London 2026 · Playoffs · Upper Quarterfinals · Bo3 Match page ↗

They have not met inside this corpus, and no substitute for that is offered. Compare their team-level dimensions below; no direct-match result is inferred.

One dimension at a time

Compare a stat across all sixteen teams.

Wins attack rounds Wins defence rounds Wins rounds Attack-sided Wins opening duels Opening kills concentrated Wins pistols More wins by elimination More wins by detonation More wins by defuse More wins on the clock More losses to detonation Converts more plants Wins more retakes Higher after a win Higher after 2+ losses Higher KAST Higher damage per round Higher headshot % More assists per 100 kills Kills concentrated Top fragger takes more Players keep one role Players keep one agent Repeats its role mix Uses unusual role mixes More distinct comps More role mixes Larger agent pool

Higher headshot % team headshot %

Separates teams; a stable read.

TYLOO 31% 27 maps

Xi Lai Gaming 31% 19 maps

Paper Rex 30% 18 maps

FUT Esports 30% 27 maps

Karmine Corp 30% 21 maps

JD Gaming 30% 30 maps

Team Liquid 30% 27 maps

EDward Gaming 29% 18 maps

Global Esports 28% 29 maps

LOUD 28% 31 maps

Nongshim RedForce 27% 32 maps

NRG 26% 22 maps

100 Thieves 26% 21 maps

Team Vitality 26% 19 maps

T1 26% 27 maps

G2 Esports 25% 30 maps

Bars run from the field low (24.9%) to high (31.1%); rows are ordered by value.